Skip to content

Category: Writing

Daily Journal – Friday, 12/29/23

Final Friday of the year, so we’re gonna keep it light today. No huffing, puffing, moralizing or moaning on about various and sundry. That’s what Monday’s for! (I kid, I kid.)

Inputs

1: The main event today was the Sun Bowl. I’m a pretty big Notre Dame football fan, owing to my being introduced to watching football by my uncle, and being taught to watch Notre Dame first and football in general second. Great game from a team of backups and second choices at many positions, with a restructured offensive line protecting the second string quarterback to a stellar performance.

2: I’ve been reading through Defector’s year end roundups and a favorite of them is the “What Our Families Thought Of Defector” series. It’s easy to see writers and columnists as autonomous voices, opinions in ink and inches1Or these days mostly pixels and ems, but metaphors die slowly., and forget the human behind the words, and the network of people within which they exist. I love that Defector wears its humanity on its sleeve and in its prose, that it isn’t afraid to be a collection of powerful voices rather than a monolith with a house voice and style. Congrats to another year to the best sports writing on the internet or anywhere else.

3: The MST3K Marathon! As is tradition, especially in the upper Midwest of the show’s birth2One of the few things I’ll give Minnesota full credit for., MST3K is running their episode marathon at the close of the year. It’s free, go watch some classics from Tom Servo, Crow, CamBot, Gypsy, and your choice of jumpsuited hosts3I’m a Joel man, myself, but they’re all great hosts, Brent..

Projects In Progress

Mostly didn’t do a thing today. It’s the last Friday of the year. Ease off the gas a bit, bud.

Notes:

  • 1
    Or these days mostly pixels and ems, but metaphors die slowly.
  • 2
    One of the few things I’ll give Minnesota full credit for.
  • 3
    I’m a Joel man, myself, but they’re all great hosts, Brent.

Daily Journal – Thursday, 12/28/23

I went down to the UPS Store and had my fingerprints taken. It was an odd experience, both psychically and physically. They have a presumably high tech scanning system that was repeatedly foiled by its inability to present a reasonable UI to the worker, the legal requirement that they, not I, place my own fingers awkwardly on a sheet of glass, and the need to take an oddly large number of scans. And then doing so at a place where most people drudge to ship packages or check PO Boxes, like some secret alternate existence of the same liminal location, a dual place like The City and The City. Some privatized privacy pryer. Records collected for you wholesale.

Anyhow, weird experience, and only the first two of the seven labors of Callimachus. Next up: traipsing to an unmarked door in the first 45 minute window in the first week of the new year where I can prove an absence through historical reckoning. Bureaucracy is a sort of magic spell. A recipe of labors. Let’s keep cookin’.

Inputs

1: On the ocean of recommendations, I watched Saltburn. Which I’m very glad was via streaming, alone, and not among others or in a public viewing.

I have a significant level of empathic twinge to me, so watching awkward takes a lot of effort. I must have paused the movie two dozen times, screwing up the nerve to delve further into the experience. Mostly that’s Barry Keoghan, who is insanely talented and yet makes me uncomfortable to watch, just from his sheer force of presence.1Or sort of anti-presence? He’s got a way of being the polar opposite of a person, in that he feels like a negative space occupied by a character. It’s mesmerizing and uncomfortable and incredibly effective. Add to that Richard Grant, who in my mind only ever plays someone on the verge of or actively experiencing a manic episode, plus the weight of posh judgment throughout and the aural distance of the accents, and it was beautiful, uncomfortable, and an experience to behold. Also, as everyone recommends, go in cold.

2: Caught the latest edition of Why Is This Interesting, which covers AI and Chain Of Thought Prompting vs Standard Prompting, in which an AI is given a more thorough instruction set to follow through rather than asked an open prompt, leading to it showing its work and more accurately arriving at an answer.

WITI looks at it through the lens of Japanese hospitality and the culture of “omotenashi”, which involves “(B)ringing your full, authentic self to serve a guest and doing so in a humble, non-ostentatious way. It is about a lack of pretense and showing no expectation of reciprocity.” The article points to a Nikkei article about the practice and how it can inform AI.

I tend to think of it more along the lines of being asked, as in educational settings, to show one’s work. While that instruction in school can feel like an imposition, an extra weight of baggage around providing an answer to a problem, what it actually does is flense open the work of arriving at that answer, so that logical or mechanical inconsistency can be seen in situ rather than obfuscated beyond the veil of the result.

Beyond this, it focuses the attention on what is often the more important result in many situations, understanding how to draw a conclusion from inference, logical reasoning, and specific effort to find a result, rather than the sheer value of the result itself.

Regardless, that AI models drawing from neuronal connection and trained on human outputs find benefit from human tasks of stepping through problems is a curious insight.

3: Bowl Week continues apace, so watched a bunch of background football with no rooting interest nor emotional attachment besides the general ennui of watching the denouement of another season of college football. It’s the end of a number of eras, the ellipsis to close out the year, and the victory lap before the victors take their lap. Here’s to college football. May we enjoy what remains before the curtains fall and the band plays us out.

Projects In Progress

Webapp: Still poking at headless CMS systems, seeing if I can make ’em bark.

Notes:

  • 1
    Or sort of anti-presence? He’s got a way of being the polar opposite of a person, in that he feels like a negative space occupied by a character. It’s mesmerizing and uncomfortable and incredibly effective.

Daily Journal – Wednesday, 12/27/23

So far, liking the new format. Feels more flexible for the very open nature of my days these…days. Yeah. Anyhow, onward!

Inputs

1: First up, this Twitter thread from @patio11, about gumption, operations, and institutional helplessness (my summary, not his).

Patrick talks about the nature of strategic thinking and the nature of organizations to not actually act from a strategic mindset from an instinct towards safety, an assumption of a lack of agency, and the ways in which large institutions turn any decision into the problem of an entire committee, to both ensure no credit goes below a certain level and that no blame rises above it.

I’ve sat in these same meetings, asked these same open questions, had these same teeth-grinding revelations. It’s somewhat cathartic, while simultaneously being maddening at the ubiquity of incentivized inaction.1Which also led me to this important tweet: https://x.com/patio11/status/1739810622357844021?s=20 and then to cold emailing a director at a company I’d like to work for who’ve had a job opening for a role I’d be a great fit for open since at least October out of, honestly, who knows, but I’m betting the same weird culture around hiring that has seemingly poisoned the entire working world lately.

2: I watched this documentary a while ago, but got to recommend to a friend2Hi Casey! with a shared interest in the wild history of Apple: General Magic.3That link goes to Kanopy, which is a favorite streaming service of mine, in that its content is parceled out via your membership to your local library. Support local libraries! This is the kind of great shit they do! General Magic itself was a sort of external spinoff operation of Apple during the Sculley years, who were given the rein to try new and inventive things, which resulted most obviously outwardly in the Newton, but also to “USB, software modems, small touchscreens, touchscreen controller ICs, ASICs, multimedia email, networked games, streaming TV, and early e-commerce notions.” It was an experiment involving some of the most weighty names of the personal computing revolution, including Andy Hertzfeld, Susan Kare, Joanna Hoffman, and Tony Fadell.

Watching the documentary, you get a real sense of the vision of Silicon Valley and the giant dreams colliding with economic realities. It’s an inspiration filled with lessons and admiration for those willing to do the wild, necessary things to move the world forward, inch by inch.

3: Caught the finale of Slow Horses season 3, which felt slightly abrupt but entertaining throughout and climactic at multiple moments. One thing among many I’ll praise about the show is that it refuses to be too precious with any character, which doesn’t allow for the sort of psychological safety built into most shows, where one never really believes the stakes because it’s not going to end in the ultimate consequence for the characters involved. Slow Horses is happy to kill off whoever it needs to to make clear that such safety is an illusion, one that kept alive by the work of imperfect people making hard choices in a messy world.

Projects In Progress

Webapp: Put some work in researching headless CMS systems, because I am all too generally eager to not only reinvent the wheel, but to drag things along the dirt my entire life rather than try someone else’s interesting round contraption. And I’m trying to fight that. So, yeah. Checking out Strapi, among others, and I’m intrigued, if curious about how things fit together. The work continues apace.

Other: I’ve put the rest of my creative outputs on a bit of a back burner, which is not overall great, but is keeping them simmering to hopefully, eventually, coalesce into a more interesting stew. Or at least less of a pot full of bits and liquids rather than a soup.4And of course now I’m wondering what the dividing line is between some junk in some liquid and a soup. Is it seasoning? A minimum amount of simmering? Surely it’s not soup if I just throw scraps of meat and vegetables into hot water. There’s got to be more of a transition point than that, right? But where is it?

Notes:

  • 1
    Which also led me to this important tweet: https://x.com/patio11/status/1739810622357844021?s=20 and then to cold emailing a director at a company I’d like to work for who’ve had a job opening for a role I’d be a great fit for open since at least October out of, honestly, who knows, but I’m betting the same weird culture around hiring that has seemingly poisoned the entire working world lately.
  • 2
    Hi Casey!
  • 3
    That link goes to Kanopy, which is a favorite streaming service of mine, in that its content is parceled out via your membership to your local library. Support local libraries! This is the kind of great shit they do!
  • 4
    And of course now I’m wondering what the dividing line is between some junk in some liquid and a soup. Is it seasoning? A minimum amount of simmering? Surely it’s not soup if I just throw scraps of meat and vegetables into hot water. There’s got to be more of a transition point than that, right? But where is it?